TRACTOR TALK

1962 FORD 2000
The early 1960s brought a lot of changes to the worldwide Ford ag equipment manufacturing empire. Ford announced a new organization, Ford Tractor Operations, in March of 1961. The goal was to consolidate all of global Ford’s ag manufacturing into one organization, under one name. As a result the British Fordson name would disappear and new tractors would follow a standardized pattern and identity worldwide under the Ford banner. The operation would culminate in 1964 with a new line of worldwide tractors, finally replacing the unique American Ford and British Fordson designs. England would build the small tractors for all markets and the U.S. operation would build the bigger stuff, again for all markets.

The Fordson organization in Britain had been a vital part of the Ford ag empire almost from it’s 1917 inception. The core of Fordson would become an equally vital part of Ford tractor operations after the name was retired. Between the advent of Ford Tractor Operations and the new Worldwide Tractors, the operation would rebadge Fordson tractors and gradually push away from the Fordson identity. Case in point, the 1962 Ford 2000 Super Dexta highlighted in this story.

The Ford 2000 Super Dexta debuted in the U.S.A. for 1962 as a renamed Fordson Super Dexta, an evolution of the 1957-61 Fordson Dexta. That was strange because there was also an American-built Ford 2000 four-cylinder tractor (gas or diesel) for 1962 which replaced the Workmaster 501, 601 and 701 series tractors. The American unit was a completely different tractor than the Super Dexta 2000, sharing only the same blue and Gray paint and the “Ford 2000” decal. Well, I guess we could call it a moment of schizophrenia before the big consolidation.

Like the earlier Dexta, the Super Dexta had a diesel that was a bit of a hybrid. Story goes that when the Dexta was being developed in the mid-’50s, Perkins offered Fordson the P3 (a.k.a. P3.144, 25 hp at the flywheel), which was already a well established powerplant. Fordson declined directly but once some design changes were agreed upon, they jointly manufactured the engines. The major castings were done at the Fordson plant in Dagenham, then shipped to Perkins for final machining and assembly. Whether the early 144 ci or the later 152 ci, the engine was known by Perkins as the “F3”, “F” for “Ford, replacing the normal “P” for “Perkins,” followed by the displacement (either 144 or 152). Reportedly, the 152 F3 three-cylinder hung on with Perkins until at least 2002. Ford three-cylinders evolved into an oversquare design (Ford always loves oversquare engines!), a similar one being a 158 ci triple that powered the smallest Ford Worldwide tractors for many years.

We covered the Ford Dexta in the February 2012 issue. The Super Dexta/Ford 2000 version differed in having revised sheet metal and colors (Blue/Gray vs Blue/Orange), a larger, more powerful and revised 3-cylinder engine (39 PTO hp vs 31) and a diff lock. Both versions of the Dexta were exceedingly good small tractors with a long list of satisfied customers. Their DNA lived on for many years in the Worldwide tractors built in the Dagenham, England, Ford tractor plant.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the advantage of the later Dexta models in terms of gear speed?

The primary benefit of newer Dexta models lies in their improved gear system. These models feature a significantly slower low gear compared to previous versions. This adjustment makes them particularly suitable for tasks that require precision, such as operating a rototiller, where controlling speed is crucial for effective results. By offering a slower low gear, these tractors provide enhanced versatility and efficiency for a range of agricultural activities.

How does the Super Dexta 2000’s performance compare to a 2000 4-cylinder gas tractor?

When comparing the Super Dexta 2000 to a 2000 4-cylinder gas tractor, the Super Dexta 2000 stands out for its superior performance and efficiency. The Super Dexta 2000 is known for working more efficiently over an extended period, outperforming the 4-cylinder gas counterpart.

Performance Highlights:

• Endurance and Efficiency: The Super Dexta 2000 is designed to handle long hours of operation with minimal downtime, making it a more reliable choice for demanding tasks.
• Power Comparison: While the 4-cylinder gas engine delivers a steady performance, the Super Dexta 2000tends to provide more consistent power, especially under heavy loads.
• Fuel Economy: Diesel engines like that in the Super Dexta 2000 often offer better fuel efficiency compared to gas engines, which can translate into long-term savings and less frequent refueling.

In summary, the Super Dexta 2000 is likely to deliver better overall performance, especially in terms of long-haul strength and efficiency, making it a preferable option in many scenarios.

What would be a fair price for a Super Dexta that needs tires and possibly other repairs?

Evaluating the Fair Price for a Super Dexta in Need of Repairs

Determining a fair price for a Super Dexta that requires new tires and possibly other repairs involves a few considerations. Here’s a comprehensive breakdown to guide your decision:

1. Condition Assessment:
   • Non-Running: If the tractor doesn’t start, you can expect its value to range from $300 to $500. This takes into account the potential engine or mechanical issues that may need attention.
   • Running Condition: If the tractor starts and operates smoothly, its initial value increases significantly, contingent upon additional factors like tire condition and overall maintenance.
2. Tire Evaluation:
   • Requires New Tires: Should new tires be necessary, and if the tractor is fully operational otherwise, a fair offer might cap around $1,000. This estimate presumes spending on tire replacements and possibly other small repairs.
   • Usable Tires: If the tires are functional—meaning they hold air, are not dry-rotted, and have decent tread—the tractor’s worth increases to approximately $2,500, assuming no major underlying issues exist.
3. Final Consideration:
   • Be sure to perform a thorough inspection beyond the surface to identify any hidden repairs that might be necessary. The operational soundness of the engine, hydromechanical components, and electrical systems should not be overlooked.

By assessing these factors, you’ll be well-equipped to make an informed purchasing decision. This approach ensures you’re investing in a tractor at a price that reflects both its current state and the necessary repairs to restore it fully.

How does the Super Dexta 2000’s engine compare to the Massey Ferguson 35 and 135 engines?

The Super Dexta 2000’s engine is remarkably similar to the engines used in the Massey Ferguson 35 and 135 tractors. These machines share the robust 3-cylinder Perkins engine, renowned for its exceptional performance and reliability. Users and experts alike often praise this engine as one of the finest ever manufactured, largely due to its consistent cubic inch displacement and reliable design features that enhance durability and efficiency.

Overall, the engines in these tractors boast a strong reputation for being dependable workhorses in their class, making them a popular choice among farmers and tractor enthusiasts.

What is the historical availability and prevalence of the Super Dexta in certain regions?

Historical Availability and Prevalence of the Super Dexta in Certain Regions

South Alabama’s Tractor Legacy

In the rural landscapes of south Alabama, the Super Dexta holds a strong presence due to its historical popularity. During the early 1960s, these tractors were widely sold, making them a staple in local agricultural communities.

Persistent Popularity

Despite their age, many Super Dextas are still active today. It’s not uncommon to see them on farms across the region, a testament to their durability and the attachment owners have to these machines. While fewer people are willing to part with their Super Dextas, contributing to their rarity in sales listings, they remain a common sight on fields, akin to the prevalence of the Ford N-series tractors.

Limited but Notable Diversity

While the Super Dexta is abundant, the larger models, such as the Super Majors, are considerably less common. This diversity in availability highlights how certain models became favorites among local farmers, leading to a vibrant but varied tractor landscape in this part of Alabama.

How much should one pay for a Super Dexta 2000 in its current condition?

When determining how much to pay for a Super Dexta 2000, the current condition of the tractor is crucial. Here’s a comprehensive guide to consider:

1. Non-Running Condition: If the tractor isn’t operational, it’s typically valued between $300 to $500. This price reflects the potential need for significant repairs or part replacements.
2. Tire Assessment:
   • Poor Condition: Should the tires be in poor condition (e.g., requiring replacement due to dry rot or lack of tread), factor in the expense for new tires. In such cases, if the tractor is otherwise in good condition, a top offer might be around $1,000.
   • Good Condition: If the existing tires can hold air and are in decent shape, this can substantially increase the tractor’s value.
3. Fully Functioning: A Super Dexta 2000 that runs well and has tires in good condition typically falls in the range of $1,500 to $2,500. This price assumes that no major repairs are needed, and it includes the consideration of robust tire health.

Always ensure to hear the tractor running and conduct a thorough inspection before finalizing any purchase, as this could significantly impact the final price.

What is the condition of a barn find Super Dexta 2000 tractor?

The Super Dexta 2000 tractor, discovered in a barn, has mostly retained its original parts and components, including the paint, which remains in good condition. However, the tires are completely flat, likely due to the tractor being stationary for several years. It comes with a 7-foot Tufline disc attached to it, which might add value if in usable condition. Overall, while the body and paint appear well-preserved, the tractor will require some work, especially with the tires, to restore it to full functionality.

Are parts for the Super Dexta 2000 expensive and hard to find in the US?

Yes, parts for the Super Dexta 2000 can be both costly and difficult to locate in the United States. This tractor features a 3-cylinder Perkins diesel engine, which differs from the Ford engines produced after 1965. Due to its limited distribution primarily within the UK and various European regions, finding replacement parts in the USposes a significant challenge.

You might find yourself needing comprehensive replacements such as a complete set of tires, seals, and potentially other components. These parts are not only hard to find but may come at a high price, emphasizing the need to source them from specialized suppliers or import them from abroad.

How did one owner’s uncle manage to obtain parts for a Super Dexta?

One owner’s uncle had a Super Dexta and was quite satisfied with its durability. Over the 40 years he owned it, he consistently sourced engine parts through a local Massey Ferguson dealer. This reliable access meant he never faced difficulties in obtaining the necessary components for maintenance or repairs. His experience stands as a testament to the availability and ease of acquiring parts for the Super Dexta through established channels.

How did the North American 2000 diesels relate to the Dexta before 1964?

The Ford 2000 Super Dexta debuted in the U.S.A. for 1962 as a renamed Fordson Super Dexta, an evolution of the 1957-61 Fordson Dexta. This introduction was intriguing because there was also an American-built Ford 2000 four-cylinder tractor (gas or diesel) for 1962, which replaced the Workmaster 501, 601, and 701 series tractors. The American unit was a completely different tractor than the Super Dexta 2000, sharing only the same blue and gray paint and the “Ford 2000” decal.

Before 1964, the North American 2000 diesels were essentially re-labeled versions of the Dexta, maintaining many of the same features and capabilities. This relationship allowed them to serve as practical options for tasks such as rototilling, thanks to the slower low gear of the later Dextas. However, after 1964, the models underwent a significant redesign, becoming a more economical version of the 3000 series. In these new iterations, the low gear was considered too fast for certain applications.

Thus, while the earlier models maintained a strong connection with the Dexta’s design, the post-1964 versions marked a departure, focusing on cost-effectiveness and different mechanical specifications. This evolution reflects the ongoing adaptations in tractor design to meet diverse agricultural needs.

How is the low gear in these tractors described in terms of usability?

In later Dexta models, the low gear is notably slower, making it suitable for tasks like using a rototiller, whereas in general, the low gear is often considered too fast for such applications.

How did the design of the 2000 series change after 1964?

After 1964, the 2000 series underwent a complete redesign, becoming a more cost-effective version of the 3000 series.

How were the earlier North American 2000 diesels related to the Dexta?

The earlier North American 2000 diesels were essentially rebranded versions of the Dexta, indicating that they were the same tractors with different labels.

What are the performance characteristics and limitations of the Super Dexta?

The engine was a mix of design features from Fordson and Perkins. It was a three-cylinder with dry sleeves, four main bearings, and a 3.6 x 5.0 inch bore and stroke, making 152 cubic inches. The bore was 0.100-in. Larger than the 144 ci Dexta. Flywheel power of the Super Dexta was 43, but grew to 45 in just a couple of years. Most of the extra power is derived from the extra displacement plus spinning the engine up from 2000 to 2250 rpm. Both variations used a Simms inline pump, but the Super Dexta was mechanically governed versus hydraulically. A glow system was used and the Super Dexta was a reasonably good cold-starter.

Performance and Usability

The Super Dexta is noted for its nimbleness and high horsepower, making it a formidable choice for a variety of tasks. In practice, it competes effectively with models like the 2000 4-cylinder gas burner, showcasing robust performance throughout the day. Though slightly lighter, it can perform much like the 3000 model, offering reliability and efficiency.

Limitations

Despite its strengths, the Super Dexta has some limitations. It lacks power steering, which can affect maneuverability for some users. Additionally, sourcing parts can be challenging as they are primarily available in England. These factors should be considered by potential buyers looking for ease of maintenance and operation.

Overall, the Super Dexta combines a well-engineered engine with practical performance characteristics, making it a valuable asset for those needing a dependable tractor with a balance of power and agility.

What is the overall user experience with the Super Dexta?

Users generally find the Super Dexta reliable and effective for extended use, describing it as a very good tractor that can handle demanding tasks throughout the day without significant issues.

What are the limitations or drawbacks of using the Super Dexta?

The main limitations include the absence of power steering and the challenge of sourcing parts, as they are predominantly available in England, which can complicate maintenance and repairs.

What are the practical performance attributes of the Super Dexta?

The Super Dexta is known for being agile and delivering high horsepower. Despite being lightweight, it remains highly functional and efficient for various tasks.

How does the Super Dexta compare to other tractor models in terms of performance?

The Super Dexta can outperform the 2000 4-cylinder gas model consistently and is likely on par with the 2000 3-cylinder diesel in terms of strength. Its capabilities suggest it operates similarly to the more robust 3000 model.

How does the Super Dexta 2000 compare to the Ford 2000 3-cylinder diesel?

“The Ford 2000 Super Dexta debuted in the U.S.A. for 1962 as a renamed Fordson Super Dexta, an evolution of the 1957-61 Fordson Dexta. That was strange because there was also an American-built Ford 2000 four-cylinder tractor (gas or diesel) for 1962 which replaced the Workmaster 501, 601 and 701 series tractors. The American unit was a completely different tractor than the Super Dexta 2000, sharing only the same blue and gray paint and the “Ford 2000” decal. Well, I guess we could call it a moment of schizophrenia before the big consolidation.

When it comes to comparing the Super Dexta 2000 to the Ford 2000 3-cylinder diesel, there are several aspects to consider:

• Engine Distinction: The Super Dexta features a 3-cylinder Perkins diesel engine, which stands apart from the later Ford 3-cylinder engines introduced post-1965. This distinction is vital for understanding the different performance dynamics between the models.
• Performance Comparison: The Super Dexta is known for its ability to outperform the Ford 2000 4-cylinder gas burner, suggesting a robust and reliable performance. Although direct comparisons with the Ford 2000 3-cylinder diesel are less documented, it’s reasonable to infer that their performance in terms of strength might be quite similar.
• Parts Availability: In the U.S., parts for the Super Dexta can be challenging to find, as it was predominantly sold in the UK and other parts of Europe. This is an important consideration for maintenance and repair.
• Overall Capability: By some accounts, the Super Dexta 2000 is comparable to the Ford 3000 in terms of performance, providing a broader context within the Ford tractor lineup.

In conclusion, while both the Super Dexta 2000 and the Ford 2000 3-cylinder diesel share the ‘Ford 2000’ name, they offer unique experiences influenced by distinct engineering and historical backgrounds.”

How does the Super Dexta perform compared to other Ford models?

The Super Dexta is noted for its superior performance over the Ford 2000 with a 4-cylinder gas engine. While a direct comparison to the Ford 2000 3-cylinder diesel isn’t provided, it is implied that they may be similar in terms of power. Additionally, the Super Dexta’s performance is comparable to the Ford 3000.

How does the availability of parts for the Super Dexta compare in different regions?

Parts for the Super Dexta are challenging to find in the United States, as the tractor was primarily sold in the UK and other European regions.

What type of engine does the Super Dexta have?

The Super Dexta is equipped with a 3-cylinder Perkins diesel engine, which is distinct from the 3-cylinder engines introduced by Ford in 1965 and later.

What are the differences between the Dexta and Super Dexta engines compared to Perkins engines?

The engine was a mix of design features from Fordson and Perkins. It was a three-cylinder with dry sleeves, four main bearings, and a 3.6 x 5.0 inch bore and stroke, making 152 cubic inches. The bore was 0.100-in. Larger than the 144 ci Dexta. Flywheel power of the Super Dexta was 43, but grew to 45 in just a couple of years. Most of the extra power is derived from the extra displacement plus spinning the engine up from 2000 to 2250 rpm. Both variations used a Simms inline pump but the Super Dexta was mechanically governed versus hydraulically. A glow system was used and the Super Dexta was a reasonably good cold-starter.

Like the earlier Dexta, the Super Dexta had a diesel that was a bit of a hybrid. Story goes that when the Dexta was being developed in the mid-’50s, Perkins offered Fordson the P3 (a.k.a. P3.144, 25 hp at the flywheel), which was already a well-established powerplant. Fordson declined directly but once some design changes were agreed upon, they jointly manufactured the engines. The major castings were done at the Fordson plant in Dagenham, then shipped to Perkins for final machining and assembly. Whether the early 144 ci or the later 152 ci, the engine was known by Perkins as the “F3”, “F” for “Ford,” replacing the normal “P” for “Perkins,” followed by the displacement (either 144 or 152). Reportedly, the 152 F3 three-cylinder hung on with Perkins until at least 2002. Ford three-cylinders evolved into an oversquare design (Ford always loves oversquare engines!), a similar one being a 158 ci triple that powered the smallest Ford Worldwide tractors for many years.

Key Differences from Perkins Engines

The Dexta and Super Dexta engines, while assembled by Perkins, were fundamentally Ford F3 units. This distinction is crucial as it underlines that these engines were not pure Perkins creations, but rather a collaborative effort with specific differences:

• Parts Compatibility: Though visually similar, many components are not interchangeable with Perkinsengines. Key differences include the injectors and injection pump, which are distinct from those used in Massey Ferguson models.
• Oil Pump and Liners: The oil pump differs from standard Perkins models, although a Perkins pump can be adapted to fit. The engine liners require pressing in and subsequent reboring, unlike the MF liners with a ridge that necessitates counter-boring of the block.
• Engine Blocks: The blocks of these engines are unique. Using an MF block involves additional modifications, such as plugging several unused holes.

These specific engineering differences highlight the unique identity of the Dexta and Super Dexta engines, despite their assembly origins with Perkins, showcasing a blend of innovation and adaptation in their design.

What are the differences in the engine blocks?

The engine blocks differ between the Dexta/Super Dexta and MF engines. If using an MF block, several spare holes must be plugged.

What are the differences in the liners?

The liners on the Ford engines need to be pressed in and then rebored. MF liners can fit, but the block needs to be counter-bored to accommodate them.

What are the differences in the oil pumps?

The oil pump in the Dexta and Super Dexta engines is different from the Perkins one. However, the Perkins oil pump can be adapted to fit with modifications.

Are parts interchangeable between the Dexta/Super Dexta engines and Perkins engines?

Parts are not interchangeable between the Dexta/Super Dexta engines and Perkins engines. Certain components, like the injectors and injection pump, differ and cannot be swapped directly.

Are the Dexta and Super Dexta engines the same as Perkins engines?

No, the Dexta and Super Dexta engines are not Perkins engines. They are Ford F3 units made at Dagenham, assembled by Perkins for Ford.

What engine does the Super Dexta have, and how does it compare to later Ford engines?

The engine was a mix of design features from Fordson and Perkins. It was a three-cylinder with dry sleeves, four main bearings, and a 3.6 x 5.0 inch bore and stroke, making 152 cubic inches. The bore was 0.100-in. Larger than the 144 ci Dexta. Flywheel power of the Super Dexta was 43, but grew to 45 in just a couple of years. Most of the extra power is derived from the extra displacement plus spinning the engine up from 2000 to 2250 rpm. Both variations used a Simms inline pump but the Super Dexta was mechanically governed versus hydraulically. A glow system was used, and the Super Dexta was a reasonably good cold-starter.

The Super Dexta had a three-cylinder Perkins diesel engine, distinct from the later 1965+ three-cylinder Fordengines. These engines, primarily found in the UK and parts of Europe, are hard to find parts for in the U.S., reflecting their limited distribution.

Like the earlier Dexta, the Super Dexta had a diesel that was a bit of a hybrid. Story goes that when the Dexta was being developed in the mid-’50s, Perkins offered Fordson the P3 (a.k.a. P3.144, 25 hp at the flywheel), which was already a well-established powerplant. Fordson declined directly, but once some design changes were agreed upon, they jointly manufactured the engines. The major castings were done at the Fordson plant in Dagenham, then shipped to Perkins for final machining and assembly. Whether the early 144 ci or the later 152 ci, the engine was known by Perkins as the “F3,” “F” for “Ford,” replacing the normal “P” for “Perkins,” followed by the displacement (either 144 or 152). Reportedly, the 152 F3 three-cylinder hung on with Perkins until at least 2002. Ford three-cylinders evolved into an oversquare design—a similar one being a 158 ci triple that powered the smallest Ford Worldwide tractors for many years.

Where were Super Dexta tractors primarily sold, and how does that affect parts availability?

These tractors were mainly sold in the UK and Europe, making it challenging to find parts in the US.

How does the Super Dexta engine compare to later Ford engines?

The engine in the Super Dexta differs from the three-cylinder engines used in Ford models produced after 1965.

What type of engine does the Super Dexta have?

The Super Dexta is equipped with a three-cylinder diesel engine from Perkins.